There is no such content in this group
Posts
19
March
2018
Agrisemantics session at IGAD pre-meeting in Berlin
by Sophie Aubin
Dear all, The Agrisemantics working session at the IGAD pre-meeting tomorrow will be dedicated to consolidate the requirements collected through the use case survey and initiate some recommendations. We will take benefit from the expertise of the many participants of IGAD who registered to our session (almost 30!). We already had very good presentations today related to FAIR principles and semantics and many questions and discussions following them. The agenda for the morning will be: 9:30 - 10:00 Intro - presentation of use case and group org0 | Add new comment
18
March
2018
IGAD at RDA P11: follow the guide
Dear Colleagues, This year IGAD will focus on the implementation of the FAIR principles during the RDA P11. To this end, we propose a three-step program: · 19-20 March at Leibniz-Gemeinschaft in Chausseestraße 111, Berlin: the pre-meeting where we will have presentations on institutional use cases, semantics and data models, and examples of implementation of the FAIR principles in research infrastructures. The full Agenda is available at0 | Add new comment
12
March
2018
RE: [rda-agrdatainterop-ig][rda-wdinterop-wg][rda-agrisemantics-wg][rda-rice-wg][on-farm-data-sharing-wg][fdiwg][metrics-indicators-agriculture] Activities during the RDA P11 (Berlin, Germany) - Don;t miss the opportunity to join!
Dear all, Additionally I would like to express our gratitude for the support that IGAD and WGs have received from the Global Open Data for Agriculture and Nutrition (GODAN), the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) and Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations to organize these series of events! Best regards, Imma - Show quoted text -From: imma.subirats=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] On Behalf Of subirats0 | Add new comment
12
March
2018
Activities during the RDA P11 (Berlin, Germany) - Don;t miss the opportunity to join!
Dear colleagues, This is just a reminder about all the activities that IGAD will undertake next week during the RDA P11 in Berlin.0 | Add new comment
08
March
2018
meeting today canceled
by Sophie Aubin
Dear all, I am sorry to have to cancel our meeting again. Too few advances on the use cases analysis have been done recently to justify a meeting. We will come back to you soon with an agenda for our meeting in Berlin on March 20 morning. Regards, Sophie Aubin INRA - Délégation à l'Information Scientifique et Technique (DIST) E-mail: ***@***.*** Tél: (33) (0)1 30 83 34 20 Mobile: (33) (0)6 67 86 87 06 Route de St Cyr (RD10) 78026 VERSAILLES-CEDEX FRANCE0 | Add new comment
22
February
2018
Friday meeting canceled
by Sophie Aubin
Dear all, There will be no online meeting on Friday 23th as no new activity or information needs to be reported to the group neither discussed since our last meeting two weeks ago. Sorry for the late notice. Regards, Sophie for the chairs0 | Add new comment
21
February
2018
Re: [rda-agrdatainterop-ig] [rda-agrisemantics-wg] Fwd: [rda-agrdatainterop-ig] Advice on new controlled vocabulary
Hi all, The UO was created before QUDT existed. As an OBO person, I am naturally a proponent of the benefits of an OBO-treatment of an ontology. However, in this particular case it may be better to use a more widely supported semantic web ontology. The UO does have some useful axiomatization linking units to qualities in PATO; but this could be transferred to a bridging ontology that uses QUDT. The UO may also have some specific terms not in QUDT, but these could be maintained as an extension ontology.0 | Add new comment
21
February
2018
Re: [rda-agrdatainterop-ig][rda-agrisemantics-wg] Fwd: [rda-agrdatainterop-ig] Advice on new controlled vocabulary
This thread is going a lot of places, so I will keep my input short (ish). Full disclosure, I have a stake in just about everything I mention. 1) The RDA VSSIG [1] has a number of task groups [2] which may be of interest. 2) If you want to use an ontology that is not in AgroPortal or BioPortal, the hopefully straightforward solution is to add the ontology to one or both repositories, that's what they are for. I should note, BioPortal is not constrained to just biomedical ontologies. A third option is ESIP's Community Ontology Repository (COR) [3].0 | Add new comment
21
February
2018
Fwd: [rda-agrdatainterop-ig] Advice on new controlled vocabulary
by Sophie Aubin
Dear agrisemantics members, I am transfering this most interesting discussion which started on the IGAD mailing list. Sorry for multiple posting Sophie Aubin - Inra - DIST -------- Message d'origine -------- De : ElizabethArnaud <***@***.***> Date : 21/02/2018 12:59 (GMT+01:00) À : RichardOstler <***@***.***>, ***@***.***, "simon.cox" <***@***.***>, "Agricultural Data Interest Group (IGAD)" <***@***.***-groups.org> Cc : valeria pesce <***@***.***>, Jonquet <***@***.***>0 | Add new comment
16
February
2018
RDA VSSIG Ontology Metadata Task Group Survey
Dear RDA WGs, I transfer this to this 3 groups that I know and sometimes participate in, but feel free to transfer this to other metadata/standardization/ontologies related WGs. Thanks ------------------- Dear all, [Apologies for multiple receptions - this announcement has been sent to multiple mailing lists of the ontology/semantic Web/linked data/standardization communities.] If you are somehow familiar with the use of ontologies, please consider answering this survey.0 | Add new comment