Dear members of the Repository Platforms for Research Data IG,
we want to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Monday, December 18th, 2017 at 13:00 CET (12:00 UTC).
We will use Adobe Connect at https://webconf.vc.dfn.de/r3rrgu81oj5
We would like to prepare our next plenary session. As Working Groups (WGs) are at the heart of RDA we would like to discuss at the RDA 11th Plenary whether there are possibilities for topics from our IG to establish new WGs. One idea is to look at our matrix and the requirements that it lists and whether one or some of those requirements could be the focus of a WG. During the virtual meeting, we would like to prepare for the discussion by taking a look at the matrix to find some candidate requirements to be considered as well as other ideas for future WG activities.
Here is the link to the matrix:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/repository-platforms-research-data-ig/...
Regards,
Robert Downs
Ralph Müller-Pfefferkorn
João Rocha da Silva
- Log in to post comments
- 5164 reads
Author: Ralph Müller-Pf...
Date: 18 Dec, 2017
Hi folks,
we just started the meeting. If you want you can still join us.
Regards,
Ralph
Author: João Rocha da Silva
Date: 18 Dec, 2017
I missed those details. I am installing Adobe Connect right now!
*João Rocha da Silva *
Invited Auxiliary Professor -- Dendro
Lead Developer -- Research Data
Management
Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Portugal
*ORCID*: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9659-6256 *GitHub*:
https://github.com/silvae86
On 18 December 2017 at 12:14:58, muepfeff (
***@***.***-dresden.de) wrote:
Hi folks,
we just started the meeting. If you want you can still join us.
Regards,
Ralph
I missed those details. I am installing Adobe Connect right now!
*João Rocha da Silva *
Invited Auxiliary Professor -- Dendro
Lead Developer -- Research Data
Management
Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Portugal
*ORCID*: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9659-6256 *GitHub*:
https://github.com/silvae86
On 18 December 2017 at 12:14:58, muepfeff (
***@***.***-dresden.de) wrote:
Hi folks,
we just started the meeting. If you want you can still join us.
Regards,
Ralph
Ralph Mueller-Pfefferkorn schrieb am 05.12.2017 um 09:05:
> Dear members of the Repository Platforms for Research Data IG,
>
> we want to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Monday, December
I missed those details. I am installing Adobe Connect right now!
*João Rocha da Silva *
Invited Auxiliary Professor -- Dendro
Lead Developer -- Research Data
Management
Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Portugal
*ORCID*: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9659-6256 *GitHub*:
https://github.com/silvae86
On 18 December 2017 at 12:14:58, muepfeff (
***@***.***-dresden.de) wrote:
Hi folks,
we just started the meeting. If you want you can still join us.
Regards,
Ralph
Ralph Mueller-Pfefferkorn schrieb am 05.12.2017 um 09:05:
> Dear members of the Repository Platforms for Research Data IG,
>
> we want to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Monday, December
18th, 2017 at 13:00 CET (12:00 UTC).
> We will use Adobe Connect at https://webconf.vc.dfn.de/r3rrgu81oj5
>
> We would like to prepare our next plenary session. As Working Groups
(WGs) are at the heart of RDA we would like to discuss at the RDA 11th
Plenary whether there are possibilities for topics from our IG to establish
new WGs. One idea is to look at our matrix and the requirements that it
lists and whether one or some of those requirements could be the focus of a
WG. During the virtual meeting, we would like to prepare for the discussion
by taking a look at the matrix to find some candidate requirements to be
--
Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/repository-platforms-research-data-ig/...
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/58163
Author: Robert Downs
Date: 18 Dec, 2017
Please find my notes, below.
RPRD IG Telecon Notes
Attendees
Ralph Muller-Pfefferkorn
Joao Rocha da Silva
Robert
Rolf Krahl
Possible ideas for new WGs to be discussed during RPRD IG Meeting:
Policy Support:
What policies should be supported?
What such policies should looke like?
Are there generic levels or stages for policies to be supported by a
repository?
What such support would look like?
Policies to support customized licenses or download or access conditions.
Are there other license conditions or access policies that need to be
supported?
What kinds of repository support for policy requirements are needed by the
community?
In which stage of the data lifecycle would polices need to be supported by
the repository?
Define workflows or processes for a repository to support specific policies.
Publication:
Which statistics are needed? Downloads?
What types of impact might be measured by the repository?
Which collections are being used?
There is currently a data usage metrics WG.
Submission:
Possible idea to extend work of current WG, which is looking at import and
export mechanisms and packaging.
API to extract data for export or to ingest data from another repository.
Automatically ingest data into repository.
Enable capabilities to analyze data.
Annotation:
Repository could allow public annotation of a dataset.
Community annotations.
Policy Support
What should be recorded in a provenance record.
Capabilities for adopting a particular provenance schema within a
repository.
Thanks,
Bob
Robert R. Downs, PhD
Senior Digital Archivist and Senior Staff Associate Officer of Research
Acting Head of Cyberinfrastructure and Informatics Research and Development
Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN),
The Earth Institute, Columbia University
P.O. Box 1000, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964 USA
Voice: 845-365-8985; fax: 845-365-8922
E-mail: ***@***.***
Columbia University CIESIN Web site: http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu
ORCID: 0000-0002-8595-5134