How do you see the future of Agrisemantics? Give your opinion!

Dear all
find my answers below
Best
Catherine
Dear all
find my answers below
Best
Catherine
Le 14/09/2017 à 16:55, Sophie Aubin a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
>
> The concept of “*Agrisemantics*” was born after the 2015 "Improving
> Semantics in Agriculture" workshop in Rome. Since then,
> “Agrisemantics” has emerged as a sort of brand to denote respectively
> an RDA working group, a wide community of interest, or something more
> concrete and actionable to be defined.
>
>
> With the first deliverable of the RDA working group, we give an
> overview of the use of semantics in the production, exchange and use
> of agricultural data: mainly a rich but fragmented landscape. The
> consensus is that “/Agrisemantics aims at improving the
> discoverability and semantic interoperability of agricultural
> information and data for the benefit of researchers, policy-makers,
> and farmers/” (Baker et al.).
>
> We are now defining the vision of *what Agrisemantics should be and
> what it should provide to the community* working / willing to work on
> / with semantics in the fields of agriculture and food.
>
> This is why we kindly invite you to contribute to this clarification
> work by answering some or all of the following questions either during
> the*IGAD pre-meeting Agrisemantics session on Monday morning in
> Montréal* or *by email* (answers received by Sunday evening will serve
> as input for the session). Each of your answers will foster a common
> vision of the future Agrisemantics.
>
> According to you,
>
> 1. What should be the mission of Agrisemantics?
>
promote semantic web technologies and associated resources to better
Dear all
find my answers below
Best
Catherine
Le 14/09/2017 à 16:55, Sophie Aubin a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
>
> The concept of “*Agrisemantics*” was born after the 2015 "Improving
> Semantics in Agriculture" workshop in Rome. Since then,
> “Agrisemantics” has emerged as a sort of brand to denote respectively
> an RDA working group, a wide community of interest, or something more
> concrete and actionable to be defined.
>
>
> With the first deliverable of the RDA working group, we give an
> overview of the use of semantics in the production, exchange and use
> of agricultural data: mainly a rich but fragmented landscape. The
> consensus is that “/Agrisemantics aims at improving the
> discoverability and semantic interoperability of agricultural
> information and data for the benefit of researchers, policy-makers,
> and farmers/” (Baker et al.).
>
> We are now defining the vision of *what Agrisemantics should be and
> what it should provide to the community* working / willing to work on
> / with semantics in the fields of agriculture and food.
>
> This is why we kindly invite you to contribute to this clarification
> work by answering some or all of the following questions either during
> the*IGAD pre-meeting Agrisemantics session on Monday morning in
> Montréal* or *by email* (answers received by Sunday evening will serve
> as input for the session). Each of your answers will foster a common
> vision of the future Agrisemantics.
>
> According to you,
>
> 1. What should be the mission of Agrisemantics?
>
promote semantic web technologies and associated resources to better
perform the tracability and sharing of agricultural data
>
> 2. What should Agrisemantics deliver? Services, resources,
> recommendations, events, standards, best practices, cookbooks…
>
Dear all
find my answers below
Best
Catherine
Le 14/09/2017 à 16:55, Sophie Aubin a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
>
> The concept of “*Agrisemantics*” was born after the 2015 "Improving
> Semantics in Agriculture" workshop in Rome. Since then,
> “Agrisemantics” has emerged as a sort of brand to denote respectively
> an RDA working group, a wide community of interest, or something more
> concrete and actionable to be defined.
>
>
> With the first deliverable of the RDA working group, we give an
> overview of the use of semantics in the production, exchange and use
> of agricultural data: mainly a rich but fragmented landscape. The
> consensus is that “/Agrisemantics aims at improving the
> discoverability and semantic interoperability of agricultural
> information and data for the benefit of researchers, policy-makers,
> and farmers/” (Baker et al.).
>
> We are now defining the vision of *what Agrisemantics should be and
> what it should provide to the community* working / willing to work on
> / with semantics in the fields of agriculture and food.
>
> This is why we kindly invite you to contribute to this clarification
> work by answering some or all of the following questions either during
> the*IGAD pre-meeting Agrisemantics session on Monday morning in
> Montréal* or *by email* (answers received by Sunday evening will serve
> as input for the session). Each of your answers will foster a common
> vision of the future Agrisemantics.
>
> According to you,
>
> 1. What should be the mission of Agrisemantics?
>
promote semantic web technologies and associated resources to better
perform the tracability and sharing of agricultural data
>
> 2. What should Agrisemantics deliver? Services, resources,
> recommendations, events, standards, best practices, cookbooks…
>
recommendations, best practices, cookbooks.
>
> 3. Which agriculture and related domains do you expect Agrisemantics
> to cover?
>
observation of field crop and tracability of products and action in the
Dear all
find my answers below
Best
Catherine
Le 14/09/2017 à 16:55, Sophie Aubin a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
>
> The concept of “*Agrisemantics*” was born after the 2015 "Improving
> Semantics in Agriculture" workshop in Rome. Since then,
> “Agrisemantics” has emerged as a sort of brand to denote respectively
> an RDA working group, a wide community of interest, or something more
> concrete and actionable to be defined.
>
>
> With the first deliverable of the RDA working group, we give an
> overview of the use of semantics in the production, exchange and use
> of agricultural data: mainly a rich but fragmented landscape. The
> consensus is that “/Agrisemantics aims at improving the
> discoverability and semantic interoperability of agricultural
> information and data for the benefit of researchers, policy-makers,
> and farmers/” (Baker et al.).
>
> We are now defining the vision of *what Agrisemantics should be and
> what it should provide to the community* working / willing to work on
> / with semantics in the fields of agriculture and food.
>
> This is why we kindly invite you to contribute to this clarification
> work by answering some or all of the following questions either during
> the*IGAD pre-meeting Agrisemantics session on Monday morning in
> Montréal* or *by email* (answers received by Sunday evening will serve
> as input for the session). Each of your answers will foster a common
> vision of the future Agrisemantics.
>
> According to you,
>
> 1. What should be the mission of Agrisemantics?
>
promote semantic web technologies and associated resources to better
perform the tracability and sharing of agricultural data
>
> 2. What should Agrisemantics deliver? Services, resources,
> recommendations, events, standards, best practices, cookbooks…
>
recommendations, best practices, cookbooks.
>
> 3. Which agriculture and related domains do you expect Agrisemantics
> to cover?
>
observation of field crop and tracability of products and action in the
fields
>
> 4. Who will be the main direct beneficiaries of Agrisemantics?
>
any computer scientists developpers involved in the use of agricultural
Dear all
find my answers below
Best
Catherine
Le 14/09/2017 à 16:55, Sophie Aubin a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
>
> The concept of “*Agrisemantics*” was born after the 2015 "Improving
> Semantics in Agriculture" workshop in Rome. Since then,
> “Agrisemantics” has emerged as a sort of brand to denote respectively
> an RDA working group, a wide community of interest, or something more
> concrete and actionable to be defined.
>
>
> With the first deliverable of the RDA working group, we give an
> overview of the use of semantics in the production, exchange and use
> of agricultural data: mainly a rich but fragmented landscape. The
> consensus is that “/Agrisemantics aims at improving the
> discoverability and semantic interoperability of agricultural
> information and data for the benefit of researchers, policy-makers,
> and farmers/” (Baker et al.).
>
> We are now defining the vision of *what Agrisemantics should be and
> what it should provide to the community* working / willing to work on
> / with semantics in the fields of agriculture and food.
>
> This is why we kindly invite you to contribute to this clarification
> work by answering some or all of the following questions either during
> the*IGAD pre-meeting Agrisemantics session on Monday morning in
> Montréal* or *by email* (answers received by Sunday evening will serve
> as input for the session). Each of your answers will foster a common
> vision of the future Agrisemantics.
>
> According to you,
>
> 1. What should be the mission of Agrisemantics?
>
promote semantic web technologies and associated resources to better
perform the tracability and sharing of agricultural data
>
> 2. What should Agrisemantics deliver? Services, resources,
> recommendations, events, standards, best practices, cookbooks…
>
recommendations, best practices, cookbooks.
>
> 3. Which agriculture and related domains do you expect Agrisemantics
> to cover?
>
observation of field crop and tracability of products and action in the
fields
>
> 4. Who will be the main direct beneficiaries of Agrisemantics?
>
any computer scientists developpers involved in the use of agricultural
data for agronomic researchs or any type of researchs
>
> 5. List the 3 to 5 flagship components of Agrisemantics
>
the description of some pilot use case using semantic web technologies
for better sharing data.
management of irrigation system of crop fiels based on sensor
dataset of field crop observation for climatic change modelling
Dear all
find my answers below
Best
Catherine
Le 14/09/2017 à 16:55, Sophie Aubin a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
>
> The concept of “*Agrisemantics*” was born after the 2015 "Improving
> Semantics in Agriculture" workshop in Rome. Since then,
> “Agrisemantics” has emerged as a sort of brand to denote respectively
> an RDA working group, a wide community of interest, or something more
> concrete and actionable to be defined.
>
>
> With the first deliverable of the RDA working group, we give an
> overview of the use of semantics in the production, exchange and use
> of agricultural data: mainly a rich but fragmented landscape. The
> consensus is that “/Agrisemantics aims at improving the
> discoverability and semantic interoperability of agricultural
> information and data for the benefit of researchers, policy-makers,
> and farmers/” (Baker et al.).
>
> We are now defining the vision of *what Agrisemantics should be and
> what it should provide to the community* working / willing to work on
> / with semantics in the fields of agriculture and food.
>
> This is why we kindly invite you to contribute to this clarification
> work by answering some or all of the following questions either during
> the*IGAD pre-meeting Agrisemantics session on Monday morning in
> Montréal* or *by email* (answers received by Sunday evening will serve
> as input for the session). Each of your answers will foster a common
> vision of the future Agrisemantics.
>
> According to you,
>
> 1. What should be the mission of Agrisemantics?
>
promote semantic web technologies and associated resources to better
perform the tracability and sharing of agricultural data
>
> 2. What should Agrisemantics deliver? Services, resources,
> recommendations, events, standards, best practices, cookbooks…
>
recommendations, best practices, cookbooks.
>
> 3. Which agriculture and related domains do you expect Agrisemantics
> to cover?
>
observation of field crop and tracability of products and action in the
fields
>
> 4. Who will be the main direct beneficiaries of Agrisemantics?
>
any computer scientists developpers involved in the use of agricultural
data for agronomic researchs or any type of researchs
>
> 5. List the 3 to 5 flagship components of Agrisemantics
>
the description of some pilot use case using semantic web technologies
for better sharing data.
management of irrigation system of crop fiels based on sensor
dataset of field crop observation for climatic change modelling
datasets of pests link to their attacked fields crop
>
> 6. What will be the form of Agrisemantics in 5 years? Community,
> e-infrastructure, organisation, task force, agency, public,
> private, distributed,...
>