This paged is used to discuss recommendations in the field of Persistent Identifiers for digital objects (data, software, configurations, etc.) which in our interpretation are essential for correct references in the emerging data landscape. The practical work has evolved as discussed at the Denver plenary. In the meantime we had a number of meetings from the GEDE group on the PID focus area, additional documents were included from different communities and a new document was created claiming to summarise essential assertions from the various contributions. This document will be discussed at P9 in Barcelona.
In the breakout session (6.4. 9.30) we will discuss PID usage issues.
In the breakout session (7.4. 9.00) we will discuss the summary assertions as a whole and discuss how we should move ahead.
The document ( GEDE PID Focus Area discussion document ) is attached below (it also contains the start assertions as appendix).
Peter
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 GEDE PID Focus Area discussion document v2.docx | 155.32 KB |
- Log in to post comments
- 8124 reads
Author: Peter Wittenburg
Date: 23 Sep, 2016
I just added the statements formulated after the RDA Europe PID days into the list to be looked at. For details look at the attached report. There may be more coming from various side.
Author: Peter Wittenburg
Date: 23 Sep, 2016
I also added the notes of the DFIG session on Guidelines in Denver - please look at chapter 2.
Peter
Author: Peter Wittenburg
Date: 23 Feb, 2017
Dear Colleagues,
as has been reported the GEDE group of infrastructure practitioners in Europe had recently its first PID focus area meeting after the face-to-face meeting at 14.11 in Bratislava. Here we will add the preparation document and the report from the meeting. These issues will be subject of the DFIG guidelines session at P9. GEDE will have another virtual meeting before the plenary and we will also report about that meeting.
best
Peter
Author: Peter Wittenburg
Date: 07 Apr, 2017
This is the aggregated new list of assertions.
Peter