Formal vote on documents

I agree to submit both the documents to the RDA.
Regards,
Claudio

I agree to submit the documents to RDA
RAiner
KIT >>>>>> Dr. Rainer Stotzka <<<<<<<<<< KIT
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Institute for Data Processing and Electronics
Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1
76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen
Germany
fon: +49 721 608 2 4738
fax: +49 721 608 2 3560
email: ***@***.***
http://ipelsdf1.lsdf.kit.edu
From: Reagan Moore <***@***.***>
Date: Thursday 12 February 2015 17:38
To: Practical Policy WG <***@***.***-groups.org>
Subject: [rda-practicalpolicy-wg] Formal vote on documents
Two documents have been uploaded to the Practical Policy directory in the RDA File Repository. Please vote on whether these documents should be submitted to the RDA. The documents have been reviewed by PPWG members and suggested revisions have been made.
Once approved, we will work with Herman Steuhower to formally submit the documents as the final deliverable from the Practical Policy working group. A discussion of the documents will be held at Plenary 5 in San Diego on Tuesday, March 10, at 9:00 AM.
Thank you,
Reagan Moore
--
Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/practical-policy-wg/post/formal-vote-d...
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/47446

Hi,

I reviewed the proposed documents and I noticed that none of the corrections proposed by our team are not included. Especially in the Implementation document we proposed some major changes to explain examples of GPFS more clearly, I think. Is there some reason for this? 

With Regards

Petr Benedikt
CESNET
data storage department

Dear Petr,
I am very sorry. No there is definitely no intention to neglect your improvements
of the documents. This is solely my fault since I started to edit a version of
the document and thought that your improvements and corrections were already
included. I just missed to double check.
Sorry again
RAiner
KIT >>>>>> Dr. Rainer Stotzka <<<<<<<<<< KIT
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Institute for Data Processing and Electronics
Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1
76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen
Germany
fon: +49 721 608 2 4738
fax: +49 721 608 2 3560
email: ***@***.***
http://ipelsdf1.lsdf.kit.edu
From: ben <***@***.***>
Date: Wednesday 18 February 2015 17:40
To: Practical Policy WG <***@***.***-groups.org>
Subject: Re: [rda-practicalpolicy-wg] Formal vote on documents
Hi,
I reviewed the proposed documents and I noticed that none of the corrections proposed by our team are not included. Especially in the Implementation document we proposed some major changes to explain examples of GPFS more clearly, I think. Is there some reason for this?
With Regards
Petr Benedikt
CESNET
data storage department
--
Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/practical-policy-wg/post/formal-vote-d...
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/47446

We have updated the documents to include the comments from cesnet.
PP 2pager-20Feb2015.docx
PP Implementations-20Feb2015.docx
PP OutcomesPolicyTemplates-20Feb2015.docx
They have been loaded into the File Repository
Reagan Moore
From: stotzka <***@***.***>
Date: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 at 3:22 PM
To: ben <***@***.***>, Practical Policy WG <***@***.***-groups.org>
Subject: Re: [rda-practicalpolicy-wg] Formal vote on documents
Dear Petr,
I am very sorry. No there is definitely no intention to neglect your improvements
of the documents. This is solely my fault since I started to edit a version of
the document and thought that your improvements and corrections were already
included. I just missed to double check.
Sorry again
RAiner
KIT >>>>>> Dr. Rainer Stotzka <<<<<<<<<< KIT
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Institute for Data Processing and Electronics
Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1
76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen
Germany
fon: +49 721 608 2 4738
fax: +49 721 608 2 3560
email: ***@***.***
http://ipelsdf1.lsdf.kit.edu
From: ben <***@***.***>
Date: Wednesday 18 February 2015 17:40
To: Practical Policy WG <***@***.***-groups.org>
Subject: Re: [rda-practicalpolicy-wg] Formal vote on documents
Hi,
I reviewed the proposed documents and I noticed that none of the corrections proposed by our team are not included. Especially in the Implementation document we proposed some major changes to explain examples of GPFS more clearly, I think. Is there some reason for this?
With Regards
Petr Benedikt
CESNET
data storage department
--
Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/practical-policy-wg/post/formal-vote-d...
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/47446

Dear colleagues,
thank you for incorporating our changes proposal. I reviewed new revision of documents and I have few more suggestions for a change in these documents. In the Outcomes policy template there is numbered list of policies on page 5. I would recommend to change the numbering of chapters in both documents to match this list, so the Introduction will be so called zero chapter without without any number and then the chapters of policies will start from 1 to 11.
And in the Outcomes policy template on page 16 (Notification policies) may be considered to change parameter to change to something more common like . With this parameter it would be more general and it will match more varieties of notifications.
Nevertheless with or without these changes I agree to submit these documents to RDA.
With regards
--
Ing. Petr BENEDIKT
Oddělení datových úložišť
CESNET, z. s. p. o., Zikova 4, 160 00 Praha 6 ** http://www.cesnet.cz