All,
>-- I also agree with this selection, especially Big Data Management as a
new topic. Big Data Machine Learning Algorithms is good idea as well.
All,
>-- I also agree with this selection, especially Big Data Management as a
new topic. Big Data Machine Learning Algorithms is good idea as well.
Not triggering a big discussion but
perhaps we can agree that
analytics/mining/machine learning
have significant overlaps and thus should
be discussed together.
Take care,
Morris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ville.tenhunen=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] Im Auftrag von vtenhunen
Gesendet: Monday, January 19, 2015 6:57 PM
An: ***@***.***-groups.org
Betreff: Re: [rda-bigdata-ig] Rebranding the Big Data Analytics IG
Dear all,
I'm interested in Big Data Infrastructures as a new topic. It is quite
near of "Big Bata Architectures", which could be alternative term for
this (perhaps little bit broader viewpoint, but still same idea, I think).
I also agree with this selection, especially Big Data Management as a
new topic. Big Data Machine Learning Algorithms is good idea as well.
BR,
Ville Tenhunen
- Log in to post comments
- 6580 reads
Author: Kwo-Sen Kuo
Date: 20 Jan, 2015
Hi,
Can we just have "Big Data"? That way the official name of our interest
group will be "Big Data Interest Group", which, I think, is very
appropriate, i.e. anything that is of interest to Big Data. It is also very
inclusive.
We could form "alliances" or "associates" with other IGs/WGs. For example,
we can form alliances/associations with Reproducibility IG to look into
reproducibility in Big Data environment, with Geospatial IG to look into
how geospatial information and processing are best done with various Big
Data technologies, etc.
We could form WGs to look into the things mentioned in previous messages in
association with Big Data. For example,
- How Machine Learning is best done with various Big Data technologies?
pluses and minuses?
- How Visualization should be done with various Big Data technologies?
Are there commonalities across the technologies? Is it possible to make the
visualization layer independent of the backend Big Data technology?
- What are the pluses and minuses (i.e. trade-offs) of various Big Data
architectures?
- How easy is data management with various Big Data technologies?
The list can go on forever... :-).
I believe with a sort of catch-all name like "Big Data Interest Group", it
can really broaden and deepen what this IG can do, with sensible management
and organization, of course.
Thanks,
Kuo
___
Kwo-Sen *Kuo*, PhD
Bayesics, LLC
Bowie, MD 20720
301-343-4569
202-492-3408
*Also affiliated with*
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Mesoscale Atmospheric Processes Laboratory
Greenbelt, MD 20771
*and*
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20740-3823
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:54 AM, morrisriedel <***@***.***-juelich.de>
wrote:
Author: Peter Baumann
Date: 20 Jan, 2015
Hi Kuo,
this is what the message wanted to say, actually. As we had discussed
beforehand, the name should be shortened (and generalized) to "Big Data IG",
thereby accommodating all facets. I couldn't agree more to what you outline below!
best,
Peter
Author: Suchith Anand
Date: 21 Jan, 2015
Good idea and Geospatial IG will be keen to work on synergies and how we can use geospatial information to bring together context. The joint meeting of Geospatial IG and Big Data IG at RDA5 will be good start for exploring ideas.
Suchith
From: kskuo <***@***.***>
To: morrisriedel <***@***.***-juelich.de>; Big Data Analytics IG <***@***.***-groups.org>
Cc: vtenhunen <***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, 20 January 2015, 16:49
Subject: Re: [rda-bigdata-ig] AW: [rda-bigdata-ig] Rebranding the Big Data Analytics IG
Hi,
Can we just have "Big Data"? That way the official name of our interest group will be "Big Data Interest Group", which, I think, is very appropriate, i.e. anything that is of interest to Big Data. It is also very inclusive.
We could form "alliances" or "associates" with other IGs/WGs. For example, we can form alliances/associations with Reproducibility IG to look into reproducibility in Big Data environment, with Geospatial IG to look into how geospatial information and processing are best done with various Big Data technologies, etc.
We could form WGs to look into the things mentioned in previous messages in association with Big Data. For example,
- How Machine Learning is best done with various Big Data technologies? pluses and minuses?
- How Visualization should be done with various Big Data technologies? Are therecommonalities across the technologies? Is it possible to make the visualization layer independent of the backend Big Data technology?
- What are the pluses and minuses (i.e. trade-offs) of various Big Data architectures?
- How easy is data management with various Big Data technologies?
The list can go on forever... :-).
I believe with a sort of catch-all name like "Big Data Interest Group", it can really broaden and deepen what this IG can do, with sensible management and organization, of course.
Thanks,Kuo
___Kwo-Sen Kuo, PhDBayesics, LLCBowie, MD 20720301-343-4569202-492-3408
Also affiliated withNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterMesoscale Atmospheric Processes LaboratoryGreenbelt, MD 20771andEarth System Science Interdisciplinary CenterUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, MD 20740-3823
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:54 AM, morrisriedel <***@***.***-juelich.de> wrote:
All,
>-- I also agree with this selection, especially Big Data Management as a
new topic. Big Data Machine Learning Algorithms is good idea as well.
Not triggering a big discussion but
perhaps we can agree that
analytics/mining/machine learning
have significant overlaps and thus should
be discussed together.
Take care,
Morris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ville.tenhunen=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] Im Auftrag von vtenhunen
Gesendet: Monday, January 19, 2015 6:57 PM
An: ***@***.***-groups.org
Betreff: Re: [rda-bigdata-ig] Rebranding the Big Data Analytics IG
Dear all,
I'm interested in Big Data Infrastructures as a new topic. It is quite
near of "Big Bata Architectures", which could be alternative term for
this (perhaps little bit broader viewpoint, but still same idea, I think).
I also agree with this selection, especially Big Data Management as a
new topic. Big Data Machine Learning Algorithms is good idea as well.
Good idea and Geospatial IG will be keen to work on synergies and how we can use geospatial information to bring together context. The joint meeting of Geospatial IG and Big Data IG at RDA5 will be good start for exploring ideas.
Suchith
From: kskuo <***@***.***>
To: morrisriedel <***@***.***-juelich.de>; Big Data Analytics IG <***@***.***-groups.org>
Cc: vtenhunen <***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, 20 January 2015, 16:49
Subject: Re: [rda-bigdata-ig] AW: [rda-bigdata-ig] Rebranding the Big Data Analytics IG
Hi,
Can we just have "Big Data"? That way the official name of our interest group will be "Big Data Interest Group", which, I think, is very appropriate, i.e. anything that is of interest to Big Data. It is also very inclusive.
We could form "alliances" or "associates" with other IGs/WGs. For example, we can form alliances/associations with Reproducibility IG to look into reproducibility in Big Data environment, with Geospatial IG to look into how geospatial information and processing are best done with various Big Data technologies, etc.
We could form WGs to look into the things mentioned in previous messages in association with Big Data. For example,
- How Machine Learning is best done with various Big Data technologies? pluses and minuses?
- How Visualization should be done with various Big Data technologies? Are therecommonalities across the technologies? Is it possible to make the visualization layer independent of the backend Big Data technology?
- What are the pluses and minuses (i.e. trade-offs) of various Big Data architectures?
- How easy is data management with various Big Data technologies?
The list can go on forever... :-).
I believe with a sort of catch-all name like "Big Data Interest Group", it can really broaden and deepen what this IG can do, with sensible management and organization, of course.
Thanks,Kuo
___Kwo-Sen Kuo, PhDBayesics, LLCBowie, MD 20720301-343-4569202-492-3408
Also affiliated withNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterMesoscale Atmospheric Processes LaboratoryGreenbelt, MD 20771andEarth System Science Interdisciplinary CenterUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, MD 20740-3823
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:54 AM, morrisriedel <***@***.***-juelich.de> wrote:
All,
>-- I also agree with this selection, especially Big Data Management as a
new topic. Big Data Machine Learning Algorithms is good idea as well.
Not triggering a big discussion but
perhaps we can agree that
analytics/mining/machine learning
have significant overlaps and thus should
be discussed together.
Take care,
Morris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ville.tenhunen=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] Im Auftrag von vtenhunen
Gesendet: Monday, January 19, 2015 6:57 PM
An: ***@***.***-groups.org
Betreff: Re: [rda-bigdata-ig] Rebranding the Big Data Analytics IG
Dear all,
I'm interested in Big Data Infrastructures as a new topic. It is quite
near of "Big Bata Architectures", which could be alternative term for
this (perhaps little bit broader viewpoint, but still same idea, I think).
I also agree with this selection, especially Big Data Management as a
new topic. Big Data Machine Learning Algorithms is good idea as well.
BR,
Ville Tenhunen