R: [rda-brokering-ig] Brokering IG

04 Jul 2014
Groups audience: 

Hello Tobias,
As far as I know, AGU will provide such capability.
Thanks,
Stefano
____________________________________________________________________________________
Dr. Stefano Nativi
Head of the CNR-IIA Division at the Area di Ricerca di Firenze
Via Madonna del Piano, 10 (50019) Sesto Fiorentino (FI) ITALY
Head of the Earth & Space Informatics laboratory (ESSI-lab) of the National Research Council of Italy - Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research - (CNR-IIA)
Tel +39 055-522-6590
Cell +39 340 6428427
Email ***@***.*** ***@***.***
Da: spearstobias=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] Per conto di spearst
Inviato: Friday, July 4, 2014 12:14
A: ***@***.***-groups.org
Oggetto: Re: [rda-brokering-ig] Brokering IG
Good morning Stefano,
Will it be possible to attend the session via GoToMeeting or WebEx?
Thanks
Tobias
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:04 AM, nativi <***@***.*** > wrote:
Brokering IG Session
IG Name
IG Brokering
Session chair(s)
Stefano Nativi (***@***.*** ), Italian National research Council of Italy
Jay Pearlman (***@***.*** ), IEEE
Max Craglia (***@***.*** ), European Commission /JRC
Abstract
Brokers, in general, have existed for many years and have found application in diverse domains and industries (e.g. financial systems, business-to-consumer systems, medicine, automotive industry). However, the emergence of brokers in science is relatively new. Brokering is now being piloted with great promise in e-infrastructure and science communities in the U.S., Europe, and elsewhere.
In science, Brokering architectures introduce a new (middleware service) framework that does not belong either to the Data Producer’s or to the User’s Communities. Its governance and sustainable operation emerges as a clear challenge. The Brokering IG prepared a statement to launch a “Brokering Governance” WG. The statement was submitted to the RDA Secretariat and Council.
This session will discuss the WG proposal situation and the received comments. The WG proposal has already captured the attention of significant programs, such as GEOSS, Earth Cube, and ODIP.
Links
https://rd-alliance.org/internal-groups/brokering-ig.html
http://www.earthobservations.org/geoss.shtml
http://earthcube.org/
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/
Draft Agenda
Introduction (All) - 15 minutes;
· Brokering framework (Chairs) – 15 minutes;
· The “Brokering Governance” statement (Stefano Nativi) – 30 minutes;
· Received Comments (Chairs) – 40 minutes;
· The way forward (Chairs) –30 minutes;
· Discussion (all) – 45 minutes;
--- break ----
· Synergies with significant programmes (Chairs and all) – 45 minutes;
· Possible WG roadmap – 30 minutes;
· Discussion (all) – 45 minutes;
· Wrap-up (Chairs) – 15 minutes
--
Full post: https://www2.rd-alliance.org/brokering-ig.html-1
Manage my subscriptions: https://www2.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www2.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/43124
--
Tobias Spears

submit a comment